Comments on: Possible Japanese Censorship Law

By: www.40kings.de

www.40kings.de — Fri, 26 Sep 2014 11:18:05 +0000

file contents box: After you have chosen your torrent file and the.
The gems from which rays don’t fall are the graces that souls forget to ask.

Today bark rope making is a lost art in numerous communities, although
it continues to be practiced for decoration or used just as one art media by many tribal artists.

By: (O_O)

(O_O) — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:53:53 +0000

this discussion just got overly intense… ZOMG

By: h8GWB

h8GWB — Fri, 22 Aug 2008 02:16:28 +0000

What?! You hate lolicon? But you like Yuki…I always thought Yuki was loli. But then again, my definition of lolicon is broadly-encompassing.

By: Travis

Travis — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 02:28:28 +0000

To let you know, there is a clear difference between child pornography and lolicon. There is also a clear difference between pedophiles who like lolicon, and those who are not pedophiles and like lolicon.

Simply put, lolicon should not have a relation to real life child pornography or actually liking young children.

By: Kingmob

Kingmob — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 08:23:56 +0000

While i’m not really someone who can say that they support lolicon, i can understand, from what ive read, the psychology behind it. People who are interested in Lolicon outside of pedophillic intent (ie people who read but otherwise have no attraction to children) are essentially very insecure people. From my experiences with communities that are sometimes lolicon centric (anyone “wHo LIeks mudkips!!1!” will know instantly what im talking about) the user bases are typically basement dwellers or people sans life. I think the most dissapointing aspect of this kind of news is not so much an issue of censorship, but more a sense of annoyance that the problem will never be solved. I think its safe to say( judging from previous posts) pedos will be pedos, doesnt matter what they access.
Lolicon is more an extension of power through loyalty/dominance. The wish for a docile, childlike partner that will be always with them ( as the fantasy goes). Anyone who is thoroughly intimidated by women as i assume most lolicons are, might relate to that notion. Instead of trying to ban shit uselessly they need to start addressing the sickness not the symptoms.

By: mstr3

mstr3 — Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:25:59 +0000

:) I’m totally against banning things up, It’s just like a result of a parent(s) who is in desperate position and can’t think of other ways to solve their own problems. Causing havoc is their selfish way of doing things to get what they wanted which is most likely (revenge). “this has a deep meaning”

Those people who think highly of themselves and can’t tolerate other behaviors and misconcepting those behaviors as “wierd/not normal” are selfish. They might as well think of themselves as wierd.

By: KokuYoku

KokuYoku — Wed, 15 Nov 2006 04:49:24 +0000

I’ve little political understanding because im still a minor, i’ve learned some stuff that might help, ok…
Right now, you are talking about America, Japan is Japan, no matter how much other cultures blend with it, first thing about Japan is that they are very cultural, contracting to sexual acts, (prostitutes..porn stars).. there is to basically commiting social and moral suicide. That person most likely will never get in a meaningful relationship…harsh? yes… (but the Japanese are harsh, they used to murder little Korean kids because they get too lazy to help them out of a dug up grave. I’m not saying all Japanese are bad though… ) Social standards of teens in Japan and America are also different.

Japan= Does not engage in sexual actions until after marriage, (therefore making more porn, because they have to wait till after marriage), they do not get a boyfriend or girlfriend unless they are seriously in love. (thats why couples can fight foever and never break up)

America= Engages in sexual action as minors, sex becomes a (too) normal thing, girlfriend, boyfriend relationship for OWN reputation

Contrasting, the Japanese are in a sense much less perverted than Americans.

Now… ill try to explain this law…
Americans are majorly influenced on movies and t.v. shows, that usually inculde violence and sex. Children want to grow up, it’s their nature, so they act what they see. And what they see is commercials with half-naked women posing for a shampoo ad, sitcoms that goes, ‘meet, date, sex, breakup’
Worse, they are watching people around their own age doing this.
BASICALLY, the media screws up the American mind.

Now.. Japan doesn’t want that, they want children to grow up like this, so they set examples using whatever things they have, anime, games, manga. I kinda think they are using romance to substitute sex… so… they want to keep up their social standards, and make it so kids dont think its ok to have sex before marriage, (for a non-christian country, they think rather christian like)

IN SUMMARY, anime, manga, and games are what the kids of Japan are watching, reading or playing. This law is an attempt to declare sex an action for married couples and they want to prevent kids from misunderstanding it.

By: Bart

Bart — Mon, 04 Sep 2006 09:52:23 +0000

Oh, we also forgot to mention, that ALL men are potentially dangerou, because we have penises. Do you know how many women were raped with men who had penises? I bet the total number would come very close to 100%. I bet men who have no penis have no urge to rape someone…so, the bottom line is, cut of the dick and you will save the children :o)

BTW. Was it Bush legislative, taht tends to support such activities as telling kids that condom is not safe? Sure, sexual absitenency is a much better unwanted pregnancy and STD spread prevention, but it operates on the assumption that everyone will keep it. Unfortunately, it is not in a human nature to do that. So, instead of helping stop the spread of STDs, less people in US now use condoms, paradoxically spreading the STDs more than ever (same goes with unwanted pregnancy).

Now, why do I say that? Way to hell is paved with good intentions. No ban has ever solved any problem and censorship the least of all.

By: Epitome

Epitome — Sun, 03 Sep 2006 23:11:45 +0000

Just great! Ban lolicon! Ban violence in TV and games! Ban porn! Ban pornographic and violent music! Ban adult literature! Ban violent literature! Ban TV, games and books! Then ban pictures and music! Why not ban art altogether? Finally ban emotions! Anybody knows the movie Equilibrium? It’s great! And the society there is just ideal! I would LOVE to have that sort of life! Really! (

By: Ryozu

Ryozu — Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:08:33 +0000

Let me start by stating some facts.
1. Paedophilia is a psychological disorder that falls under the same classification as homosexuality. It is incurable.

If a person is a paedophile, it’s not because they chose to be that way, nor is it something they can change. It may or may not be triggered by consumed media. The key word here is “triggered.” It was there to start with, and may come to surface in a person’s mind reguardless of their consumption of relevant media.

2. A person is responsible for the decisions they make.

If a person molests a child, they are responsible for their choice of actions. Claiming that the viewing of lolicon art influenced their decision is certianly not impossible, however, does that mean the blame should be shifted from the person who made the choice to the lolicon art? Self control is something that needs to be taught to every individual as they grow.

A lack of self control does not mean the media that that influenced their behaviour is responsible for that person’s actions.

Speaking from experience on this last point:
Sexual urges can be triggered by nearly anything. Be it a girl in a bathing suit, a clothing catelog or lolicon art. When faced with sexual urges, a person has to make a choice. That person can relieve the sexual urges or supress them. If they choose to relieve that sexual urge, it can be done through many ways. Most of those ways are legal. Masturbation or sexual activity with a consenting adult are legal. Sexual activity with a child, or rape of a person of any age are illegal. Not once when looking at lolicon, or any other form of pornography have I ever felt the only way to relieve my sexual urges was to commit a crime. Through the use of legal pornography, lolicon or otherwise, I can simply fantasize and masturbate.

Supressing urges only causes them to resurge stronger the next time stimuli is faced.

Human beings are perfectly capable of seperating fantasy from reality. In the cases where a person cannot seperate reality from fantasy, how can it be said their fantasy wasn’t triggered by some otherwise “harmless” and legal stimuli, such as going to the beach?

I ramble, but to sum it up. I find there is no supporting evidence that lolicon art is to blame for child molestation. If there is a cause, it is much deeper rooted, such as the inability to seperate reality from fantasy, or the inability to control oneself. If the true problems are these, no amount of censoring will fix the problem, as there is always some kind of stimuli that one can use.